Publications

Below, publications from our group are listed. Many of them can be downloaded here.

PhD theses

• Deshpande P (2023). Toward Clinical Measures of Speech Comprehension: Cortical Speech Processing in Normal-Hearing Listeners, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implantees, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
• Koiek S (2022). Assessment of Hearing Abilities in Noise in School-Age Children with Normal Hearing and Early-Childhood Otitis Media, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
• Wu M (2022). Investigating Speech-in-Noise Outcome in Older Hearing-Aid Users Using Auditory Profiling, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark

Journal articles

2024

• Jürgensen L, Neher T & Fereczkowski M. Rollover at moderate to high levels in hearing-impaired listeners for speech materials with and without semantic context information. Under review
• Denk F, Simon L-M, Trautmann Y, Goicke S, Albrecht S, Andersen PK, Jürgensen L, Schönweiler R, Jürgens T, Neher T & Husstedt H. Application scenarios for a mobile hearing aid demonstrator with headphone form factor. Resubmitted
  
• Van Yper L, Brandt C, Korsholm M, Godballe C, Schmidt JH & Neher T. The impact of early-childhood otitis media on hearing abilities: A scoping review. Ear Hear, in press
  
• Súsonnudóttir B, Kowalewski B, Stiefenhofer G & Neher T (2024). Individual differences underlying preference for processing delay in open-fit hearing aids. Trends Hear, 28, DOI: 10.1177/23312165241298613 (in press)
• Andersen PK, Jürgensen L, Denk F, Husstedt H, Jürgens T & Neher T (2024). Evaluation of a research hearing aid for audiological testing. Int J Audiol, 1-10, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2431830 (in press)
• Deshpande P, Van Yper L, Christiansen S, Brandt C, Debener S & Neher T (2024). Speech comprehension by cochlear implant users assessed with evoked potentials and response times. Audiol Neurotol, 1-13, DOI: 10.1159/000538701
• Koiek S, Brandt C, Möller S, Dillon H & Neher T (2024). Masked speech recognition by 6-13-year-olds with early-childhood otitis media: Effects of acoustic condition and otologic history. Int J Audiol, 1-8, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2348506
• Lelic D, Nielsen LLA, Pedersen AK & Neher T (2024). Focusing on positive listening experiences improves speech intelligibility in experienced hearing aid users. Trends Hear, 28, DOI: 10.1177/23312165241246616
• Cañete OM, Loquet G, Sanchez-Lopez R, Hougaard DD, Schnack-Petersen R, Gaihede M, Schmidt JH, Hammershøi D & Neher T (2024). Auditory profile-based hearing aid fitting: Self-reported benefit for first-time hearing aid users. Audiol Res, 14(1), 183-195
  
• Fereczkowski M, Sanchez-Lopez R, Christiansen S & Neher T (2024). Amplitude compression for preventing rollover at above-conversational speech levels. Trends Hear, 28, DOI: 10.1177/23312165231224597

2023

• Deshpande P, Brandt C, Debener S & Neher T (2023). Does experience with hearing aid amplification influence electrophysiological measures of speech comprehension? Int J Audiol, 1-10, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2284675
  
• Andersson KE, Neher T & Christensen JH (2023). Ecological momentary assessments of real-world speech listening are associated with heart rate and acoustic condition. Front Audiol Otol, 1:1275210, DOI: 10.3389/fauot.2023.1275210
  
• Fereczkowski M & Neher T (2023). Semantic context can mask intelligibility declines at above-conversational speech levels in normal-hearing listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 66(6), 2177-2183
• Keidser G, With SBL, Neher T & Rotger-Griful S (2023). Do visual cues aid comprehension of a dialogue? Hear J, 76(3), 22-24
• Sanchez-Lopez R, Nielsen SG, El-Haj-Ali M, Bianchi F, Fereczkowski M, Cañete O, Wu M, Neher T, Dau T & Santurette S (2023). Corrigendum: Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery. Front Neurosci, 16:1122830, DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1122830
• Fereczkowski M & Neher T (2023). Predicting aided outcome using aided word recognition scores measured with linear amplification at above-conversational levels. Ear Hear, 44(1), 155-166

2022

• Neher T, Fogh SH & Koiek S (2022). Masked speech recognition by normal-hearing 6-13-year-olds in conditions with and without interaural difference cues. Trends Hear, 26, DOI: 10.1177/23312165221137117
• Deshpande P, Brandt C, Debener S & Neher T (2022). Comparing clinically applicable behavioral and electrophysiological measures of speech detection, discrimination, and comprehension. Trends Hear, 26, DOI: 10.1177/23312165221139733
• Lelic D, Stiefenhofer G, Lundorff E & Neher T (2022). Hearing aid delay in open-fit devices: Preferred sound quality in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. JASA Express Lett, 2(10):104803, DOI: 10.1121/10.0014950
• Sanchez-Lopez R, Wu M, Fereczkowski M, Santurette S, Baumann M, Kowalewski B, Piechowiak T, Bisgaard N, Ravn G, Narayanan SK, Dau T & Neher T (2022). Towards auditory profile-based hearing-aid fittings: BEAR rationale and clinical implementation. Audiol Res, 12(5), 564-573
• Wu M, Christiansen S, Fereczkowski M & Neher T (2022). Revisiting auditory profiling: Can cognitive factors improve the prediction of aided speech-in-noise outcome? Trends Hear, 26, DOI: 10.1177/23312165221113889
• Koiek S, Brandt C, Schmidt JH & Neher T (2022). Monaural and binaural phase sensitivity in school-age children with early-childhood otitis media. Int J Audiol, 61(12), 1054-1061
  

2021

• Sanchez-Lopez R, Nielsen SG, El-Haj-Ali M, Bianchi F, Fereczkowski M, Cañete O, Wu M, Neher T, Dau T & Santurette S (2021). Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery. Front Neurosci, 15:724007, DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.724007
• Wu M, Cañete O, Schmidt JH, Fereczkowski M & Neher T (2021). Influence of three auditory profiles on aided speech perception in different noise scenarios. Trends Hear, 25, DOI: 10.1177/23312165211023709
• Sanchez-Lopez R, Fereczkowski M, Santurette S, Dau T & Neher T (2021). Towards auditory profile-based hearing-aid fitting: Fitting rationale and pilot evaluation. Audiol Res, 11(1), 10-21
• Andersson KE, Andersen LS, Christensen JH & Neher T (2021). Assessing real-life benefit from hearing-aid noise management: SSQ12 questionnaire vs. ecological momentary assessment with acoustic data-logging. Am J Audiol, 30(1), 93-104

2020

• Sanchez-Lopez R, Fereczkowski M, Neher T, Santurette S & Dau T (2020). Robust data-driven auditory profiling towards precision audiology. Trends Hear, 24, DOI: 10.1177/2331216520973539
• Wu M, Sanchez-Lopez R, El-Haj-Ali M, Nielsen SG, Fereczkowski M, Dau T, Santurette S & Neher T (2020). Investigating the effects of four auditory profiles on speech recognition, overall quality, and noise annoyance with simulated hearing-aid processing strategies. Trends Hear, 24, DOI: 10.1177/2331216520960861
• Koiek S, Nielsen JB, Kjærbæk L, Gormsen MB & Neher T (2020). A Danish sentence corpus for assessing speech recognition in noise in school-age children. Trends Hear, 24, DOI: 10.1177/2331216520942392